Main Article Content
Abstract
Butterfly pea flower (Clitoria ternatea L.) has been used extensively in traditional medicine due to its various health benefits. The ash content in the butterfly pea simplicia can provide important information about the mineral content and residues present in the material. This study aimed to carry out a systematic review in order to explore a comparison of the standardization of ash content of the butterfly pea flower simplicia. The literature search process was carried out on various databases (PubMed, Web of Sciences, EMBASE, Cochrane Libraries, and Google Scholar) regarding the comparison of standardization of ash content of Clitoria ternatea. This study follows the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) recommendations. Several studies have shown variations in the ash content of butterfly pea flowers (Clitoria ternatea L.). The ash content of the butterfly pea flower (Clitoria ternatea L.) is in the range of 3.8 ± 0.42 mg/100 gram dry weight to 10.93 ± 0.29 mg/100 gram dry weight. Each plant has unique chemical characteristics, including different mineral content. Therefore, the ash content may vary between different plant species.
Keywords
Article Details
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.